Advertisement

Reply

      We appreciate Szary et al's interest and letter to the editor regarding our papers comparing outcomes of CEAP 6 patients undergoing cyanoacrylate vs thermal ablative techniques.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      SVS Member Login
      Society Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Use your society credentials to access all journal content and features
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kiguchi M.M.
        • Reynolds K.B.
        • Cutler B.
        • Tefera E.
        • Kochubey M.
        • Dirks R.
        • et al.
        The need for perforator treatment after VenaSeal and ClosureFast endovenous saphenous vein closure in CEAP 6 patients.
        J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021; 9: 1510-1516
        • O’Banion L.A.
        • Reynolds K.B.
        • Kochubey M.
        • Cutler B.
        • Tefera E.A.
        • Dirks R.
        • et al.
        A comparison of cyanoacrylate glue and radiofrequency ablation techniques in the treatment of superficial venous reflux in CEAP 6 patients.
        J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021; 9: 1215-1221
        • Dermody M.
        • O'Donnell T.F.
        • Balk E.M.
        Complications of endovenous ablation in randomized controlled trials.
        J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013; 1: 427-436.e1

      Linked Article

      • Deep vein insufficiency, not the method choice, determines the outcome of endovascular treatment in CEAP 6 patients
        Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic DisordersVol. 9Issue 6
        • Preview
          We have read two interesting reports recently published in JVS-VLD by O'Banion et al.1,2 In the first paper, the authors described a short-term outcome of superficial venous reflux treatment using cyanoacrylate (CA) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation in CEAP 6 patients.1 The second paper concerned the auxiliary perforator treatment in the same patients in the follow-up period.2 In both papers, the authors concluded that CA shows superiority over RF in time required to wound healing1 and requires less perforator interventions.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF